Cognitive Consensus
Kirkman et al. (2001) differentiated between team measures aggregated by individual team members and measures based on team member consensus. Measures based on team member consensus involved team members meeting to determine a team response to test items. The input from Kirkman et al.’s (2001) study was the gain of consensus scores over aggregated scores.
- Aggregated: from individual level of analysis
- Consensus: at team level of analysis
Collins and Smith (2006) looked at consensus from the viewpoint of social climate — the collective (consensus) shared norms, values, and beliefs about employee interactions.
- Social Climate
- Shared norms
- Values
- Beliefs
This consensus measure, knowledge exchange/combination, was measured by a questionnaire designed to evaluate the degree to which employees felt they were able to exchange and combine information.
References
Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794671
Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual-level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 54, 645–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00226.x
